Beyond the Funnel: A Better Model for Higher Ed Student Engagement

Connected systems help institutions personalize engagement, respond in real time, and support the entire student journey.

GUEST COLUMN | by Jess Lanning

The traditional enrollment funnel—awareness, inquiry, application, decision—has guided higher ed institutions for decades. And the framework itself isn’t the problem. It’s that the systems built to execute it haven’t kept up.

Today’s students move across channels, devices, and timelines that rarely follow a straight line. Yet most institutions still operate with disconnected tech: a CRM for recruitment, a student information system (SIS) for enrollment, separate platforms for advising, and marketing tools that don’t talk to any of them.

The result? Fragmented data, incomplete engagement histories, and missed opportunities to act when it matters most.

‘The result? Fragmented data, incomplete engagement histories, and missed opportunities to act when it matters most.’

The Visibility Problem

Consider a common scenario: A prospective student sees an ad, visits a few program pages over the course of a week, opens a follow-up email, and eventually applies through the website. Each of those interactions might get captured, but often in different systems that don’t share information.


Key Takeaways

  • Modern student journeys don’t follow a linear path, and institutions that rely on disconnected systems can’t keep up.
  • When CRMs, student information systems, and learning management systems share data in real time, institutions can respond to student behavior as it happens.
  • Maintaining engagement history across every touchpoint allows staff to personalize outreach and have more informed conversations at every stage.
  • Shared systems give departments a common data foundation, enabling the kind of coordinated, timely responses that siloed platforms make impossible.

Without integration, the institution loses critical context. Which channels influenced the decision to apply? What content resonated? Where did the student disengage?

The same blind spots persist after application. When an enrolled student starts pulling back—logging in less, skipping sessions—the warning signs often exist somewhere in the data. But if that data lives across disconnected platforms, no one sees the full picture in time to respond.

Building a Connected Infrastructure

Closing these gaps requires systems that can actually talk to each other. A CRM can serve as the engagement hub, capturing interactions across the student journey, but only if it’s connected to the rest of the ecosystem, including marketing automation, the SIS, the learning management system (LMS), and analytics tools.

When these systems share data in real time, institutions build a continuously updated picture of each student, their behaviors, interests, and engagement patterns, rather than a snapshot frozen at one moment. That view holds whether the student is a first-time applicant, a transfer, or an adult learner returning after years in the workforce.

Turning Data Into Action

When systems are connected, data stops sitting in dashboards and starts driving decisions.

With integrated analytics, institutions can build automated workflows that respond to student behavior as it happens, rather than waiting for a weekly report or manual review. A few examples of what that looks like in practice:

  • A student who starts an application but doesn’t finish it receives a personalized follow-up tied to their program of interest.
  • An adult learner browsing certificate options triggers coordinated outreach from both admissions and advising.
  • An enrolled student whose LMS activity drops gets flagged for early intervention before disengagement becomes withdrawal.

The ability to move quickly and consistently from insight to action is what separates connected institutions from those still working in silos.

Keeping Context Across Every Touchpoint

Personalization fails when data resets at every handoff. A student might spend weeks engaging with marketing content, only to be treated as a stranger when they reach admissions. They might apply after careful research, then receive a generic follow-up that ignores everything they already shared.

Maintaining context means each interaction builds on what’s already known. When a prospective student returns to the website, content should reflect what they’ve already looked at. When they speak with an advisor, that advisor should see their full engagement history, including emails opened, events attended, and pages visited. If a student pauses and returns months later, the institution should recognize them and pick up where things left off.

This continuity makes the student experience feel more relevant and gives staff the context they need to have better conversations.

When Departments Work From the Same Data

Integration also solves an internal coordination problem. When teams work from separate platforms, information gets duplicated, delayed, or lost entirely, and students end up with an inconsistent experience depending on who they talk to.

Shared systems change that. When a student reengages after a gap, the signal can simultaneously prompt admissions to share updated program information, advising to review prior coursework, and career services to surface relevant opportunities. That kind of coordinated response is only possible when everyone is working from the same data.

The Path Forward

Institutions that continue relying on disconnected platforms will keep running into the same problems: incomplete data, inconsistent outreach, and slow response to student needs.

Those that invest in connected systems are better positioned to meet students where they actually are. The goal is continuous, informed support across the full span of a student’s educational journey, from first inquiry to graduation and beyond.

Jess Lanning is senior director of enrollment marketing strategy at Liaison. With nearly 15 years of higher education marketing experience, she has led strategies serving undergraduate, adult, and graduate audiences. She also teaches marketing as an adjunct professor at a local university and several community colleges. Connect with Jess on LinkedIn.

0 Comments

    Leave a Comment

    %d bloggers like this: